 |
Start Your Visit With ...Historical TimelinesChronological Eras Information Tables General Interest Maps Glossary History Quizzes What Made Today Famous??? |
| ||
|---|---|---|
Election of 1860 |
|
Start Your Visit With ...Historical TimelinesChronological Eras Information Tables General Interest Maps Glossary History Quizzes What Made Today Famous??? |
The Democratic Party was in disarray in 1860 when they convened in Charleston, South Carolina to choose their presidential candidate. Southern elements insisted that the nominating convention make a strong statement supporting slavery in the territories. Western elements, however, opposed that stance and argued for an endorsement of popular sovereignty. The latter position prevailed and the Southern delegates walked out.
The Northern Democrats later met in Baltimore, Maryland, and nominated Stephen A. Douglas. Following the violence in "Bleeding Kansas," Douglas had lost much support within the party; however, he had reclaimed his prominence by denouncing Buchanan and the Lecompton constitution in 1858.
The Southern Democrats reconvened in Richmond, Virginia and nominated John C. Breckinridge; the platform pledged the protection of slavery in the territories. A moderate position was sought by the Constitutional Union Party, which nominated John Bell. The party, composed mostly of former Whigs, enjoyed some strength in the Border States, but lacked any semblance of vigor and was dubbed the "Old Gentlemen's Party."
William H. Seward confidently anticipated the nomination from the Republican Party in 1860. The party leaders, however, realized that they had to become more than simply the focal point for antislavery sentiment. Included in the platform were calls for a moderately higher tariff, federally sponsored internal improvements, a homestead bill and federal assistance for a transcontinental railroad to be built over the central route. On slavery, the Republicans proclaimed that each state could decide the issue within its own borders and that no one (Congress or the territorial legislatures) could legalize slavery in the territories.
Abraham Lincoln was a respected state politician in Illinois. He was attractive to the Republican delegates because he was a talented speaker, had a moderate position on slavery and was a Westerner who could mount a challenge to Douglas. Seward led on the first few ballots, but Lincoln remained in contention. On the third ballot Lincoln prevailed, his victory due largely to the skillful maneuverings of his campaign managers. They lined up votes with promises of patronage and jammed the convention with Lincoln supporters.
During the campaign, Lincoln ventured into the South where he preached the value of the Union. In almost the same breath he also warned against secession and pledged that he would, if necessary, act with the conviction of Andrew Jackson in the nullification crisis almost 30 years earlier.
Lincoln's strength was confined to the populous Northern states, but he won a decisive victory in the Electoral College. However, he polled only about 40 percent of the popular vote. Douglas garnered an impressive popular vote, but barely made a showing in the electoral tally.
| Election of 1860 Candidates |
Party
|
Electoral Vote
|
Popular
Vote |
| Abraham Lincoln (Illinois) Hannibal Hamlin (Maine) |
Republican
|
180
|
1,865,593
|
| Stephen A. Douglas (Illinois) Herschel V. Johnson (Ga.) |
(Northern)
Democratic |
12
|
1,382,713
|
| John C. Breckinridge (Ky.) Joseph Lane (Oregon) |
Southern (Independent) Democrat
|
72
|
848,356
|
| John Bell (Tennessee) Edward Everett (Mass.) |
Constitutional Union
|
39
|
592,906
|
Election of 1860
Election of 1860 2004 1968 1932 1896 1860 2000 1964 1928 1892 1856 1996 1960 1924 1888 1852 1992 1956 1920 1884 1848 1988 1952 1916 1880 1844 1984 1948 1912 1876 1840 1980 1944 1908 1872 1836 1976 1940 1904 1868 1832 1972 1936 19Election of 1860 2004 1968 1932 1896 1860 2000 1964 1928 1892 1856 1996 1960 1924 1888 1852 1992 1956 1920 1884 1848 1988 1952 1916 1880 1844 1984 1948 1912 1876 1840 1980 1944 1908 1872 1836 1976 1940 1904 1868 1832 1972 1936 1900 1864 1828 ...
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1860
SparkNotes: The Civil War 1850–1865: The Election of 1860 and Secession: 1859–1861
... Election of 1860 With the parties split and compromise no longer a solution, the election of 1860 was less a national election that two sectional elections. Most Southern states refused to put Lincolnâs name on the ballot orElection of 1860 With the parties split and compromise no longer a solution, the election of 1860 was less a national election that two sectional elections. Most Southern states refused to put Lincolnâs name on the ballot orelection of 1860 was less a national election that two sectional elections. Most Southern states refused to put Lincolnâs name on the ballot or acknowledge ...
http://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/civilwar/section4.rhtml
The election of 1860
On the approach of the period for the 1860 election the state of public feeling had grown far more violent, and the hot-headed leaders of Southern politics were so determined upon having all or nothing that they divided their party and insured ...
http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/The_Great_Republic_By_the_M ...
