Sugar Act of 1764
Start Your Visit WithHistorical Timelines
General Interest Maps
The Molasses Act of 1733 had called for a tax of sixpence per gallon on non-British sugar and molasses imported into the North American colonies. This measure had been proposed by sugar growers in the British West Indies who wanted Parliament’s assistance to force the colonies to buy their produce, not the less expensive sugar of the competing Spanish and French islands. The sixpence tax was high and, if strictly enforced, would have caused severe hardship for the New England distilleries. Rum was the great social lubricant of the day and was much in demand throughout the colonies, but heavy taxation could put the beverage out of the reach of many in the lower reaches of society.
The ever-frugal New Englanders worked their way around the tax by smuggling, and bribing customs officials. British enforcement officers were aware of what was happening, but followed London's tacit “salutary neglect” of the colonies. Merchants on both sides of the Atlantic were prospering, so why rock the boat?
In 1764, Prime Minister George Grenville was in a boat-rocking mood when he faced the huge public debt accumulated during the recently concluded French and Indian War. He identified a ready source of revenue in the old Molasses Act and succeeded in changing its provisions to include the following:
Protests of this Grenville policy were widespread. James Otis, a leader in Massachusetts, wrote The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved, using similar arguments to those he had used early against the writs of assistance.
Bitter Yankee distillers helped to arrange a non-importation boycott of British goods. That idea, adopted by a town meeting of Bostonians, later spread to other areas in New England and New York. Colonial opposition, however, was often couched in constitutional, not economic, terms. Most Americans of the day agreed that Parliament had the right to regulate trade for the empire, as they had done with the Molasses Act of 1733 and the earlier Acts of Trade. However, the Sugar Act was not trade regulation. Its specific aim was to raise revenue. Americans were accustomed to being taxed by their own assemblies, but not by a faraway Parliament where they were not represented. It was during the protests of 1764 the cry of “no taxation without representation” was first widely heard.
The impact of this legislation was magnified by other unpopular programs being introduced by the Grenville government at essentially the same time.
See timeline of the American Revolution.
---- Selected Quotes ----
Quotes regarding Sugar Act of 1764.
By James Otis
If we are not represented, we are slaves.
Report on the Sugar Act
Historical Documents - The Sugar Act - Titled The American Revenue Act of 1764
... duty, or tax, on the import of rum and molasses from non-English areas, with the Sugar Act of 1764. This act forbade the importation of foreign rum; put a modest duty on molasses from all sources and levied duties on wines, silkSugar Act of 1764. This act forbade the importation of foreign rum; put a modest duty on molasses from all sources and levied duties on wines, silks, coffee and ...
Sugar Act; Stamp Act
... Our Georgia History When enacted in May, 1764, the Sugar Act (Revenue Act of 1764) was intended to raise revenue to repay England's national debt. Although the act is frequently compared to the unenforced Molasses Act of 1733, the Sugar Act ...
The Sugar Act
... On April 5, 1764, Parliament passed a modified version of the Sugar and Molasses Act (1733), which was about to expire. Under the Molasses Act colonial merchants had been required to pay a tax of six pence per gallon on the importation of ...