Share

Plessy v. Ferguson

During the 1950s and 1960s, racial integration of public schools became a major educational issue in the United States. Most schools in Southern states were racially segregated by local or state laws. In the North, local attitudes and neighborhood separation of the races resulted in numerous schools that were segregated in reality, but not in legal terms, i.e. de facto segregation.

Segregated water fountain

The Supreme Court had ruled, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, that an 1890 Louisiana law mandating "separate but equal" facilities for whites and blacks on and near railroads was allowable.

In 1892, passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a "Jim Crow" (blacks only) car and was promptly arrested. He was brought before the Criminal Court for New Orleans, Judge John H. Ferguson presiding, who affirmed the state law. The case reached the Supreme Court, where the law was challenged on grounds that it contradicted the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution (text).

The court ruled, by a seven to one vote, that a state law that suggests a simple legal distinction between the two races was not inconsistent with the 13th Amendment, which prohibits involuntary servitude. The court also held that passenger Plessy was not stripped of equal protection of the law under the 14th Amendment, if the facilities were separate but equal; according to the 1896 court, separate was not unequal. The notion remained in effect and slowly expanded into other social sectors for nearly 60 years.

The doctrine of separate-but-equal facilities was applied by degrees to schools. However, in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the Supreme Court reversed the 1896 decision. The court ruled that "separate but equal facilities are inherently unequal."


See also Constitution (narrative) .

Off-site search results for "Plessy v. Ferguson"...

Plessy v. Ferguson
On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in the Plessy v. Ferguson law case that separate-but-equal facilities on trains were constitutional. One justice, John Marshall Harlan, disagreed with the ruling and argued that separating blacks from ...
http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/jb/progress/plessy_1

Plessy v. Ferguson
Title: Plessy v. Ferguson Author: U.S. Government Year Published: 1896 PLESSY v. FERGUSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting. MR. JUSTICE BREWER did not hear the argument or participate in the ...
http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/plessy.html

After the Civil War: Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy went to court and argued, in Homer Adolph Plessy v. The State of Louisiana, that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The judge at the trial was John Howard Ferguson, a lawyer from ...
http://www.watson.org/~lisa/blackhistory/post-civilwar/plessy.html